Saturday, February 15, 2014

Why weren't there any suspension-feeding marine reptiles in the Mesozoic?

The Mesozoic (the so-called 'age of dinosaurs') is not only famous for the terrestrial dinosaurs but a host of large to gigantic reptiles living full time in the sea. There were the fish-like ichthyosaurs, long-necked plesiosaurs, giant macropredaceous pliosaurs, sea going-crocs (metriorhynchids), giant sea going lizards (mosasaurs) and barrel-bellied, armoured shellfish crushers (placodonts). There is a strange omission among this riotous diversity. There is no large pelagic suspension-feeding equivalent of modern baleen whales. This absence has been noticed by many and has formed the topic of many discussions (most recently in the comment section of this tetzoo post). While a very few mesozoic reptiles do show some suspension feeding adaptations, the only convincing suspension feeders (Henodus and Atopodentatus) are a) restricted to the Triassic, b) small, and c) geographically and temporally restricted exceptions that appear to have died out quickly without spawning any appreciable radiation of suspension feeders.
Several explanations have been offerred, none are very convincing to me. One tack is to lay the explanation at the feet (flippers?) of the marine reptiles themselves. Without a set of pharyngeal muscles to seal the throat from the mouth (thus preventing ingestion of large quantities of seawater), or a well-developed set of lip muscles around the mouth to prevent lateral escape of water and food particles or a fast swallowing reflex sauropsids were ill-suited to evolving suspension feeding. In contrast these specialisations were present in mammals before they became aquatic, pre-adapting them to become suspension feeders. This idea is explained more fully in Collin and Janis (1997). I find this explanation rather weak because: a) crocodiles have evolved a mechanism to seal the throat from the mouth despite being sauropids, b) turtles have evolved aquatic suction feeding (one of the mechanisms of suspension feeding) without any of the modifications seen in mammals and c) Mesozoic marine reptiles had to have had mechanisms to prevent engulfing too much seawater whilst feeding underwater in anycase. There can be little doubt that big-mouthed ichthyosaurs, mosasaurs and pliosaurs all engulfed their prey while underwater.
So if intrinsic factors relating to the sauropsids themselves are not convincing then the explanation must lie in some extrinsic factor relating to the environment of the Mesozoic seas.
 It has been suggested that the warm waters that predominated for most of the Mesozoic couldn't host large masses of zooplankton to make bulk filter-feeding viable. But, as Heteromeles pointed out, although there aren't the huge clouds of krill that you get in cooler upwelling zones, there is enough suspended plankton in tropical seas to support numerous filter feeders such as manta rays, whale sharks and minke whales.
I don't know the answer to this conundrum but I have an idea that doesn't seem to be mentioned elsewhere. I think the failure of Mesozoic marine reptiles to develop a large suspension feeder is because the niche was well and truly sown-up by another mega-diverse clade. I'm not talking about pachycormid fish. These guys certainly were a long lasting clade of whale-sized suspension feeders in the Mesozoic but they do not appear to have been prolific and wide-ranging enough to have completely excluded all  sauropsids from the niche. No I think there is a simple answer, something that was virtually ubiquitous throughout all Mesozoic seas and oceans that is completely absent in the Cenozoic: ammonites.
Yes those (mostly) coiled shelly cephalopds that are virtually synonymous with the popular conception of the word 'fossil'. We don't know much about the soft-tissues of ammonites. They are usually reconstructed as having robust nautilus or even squid-like tentacles and macropredaceous habits. I've even seen more than one reconstruction of the giant ammonite Pachydiscus attacking and killing an ichthyosaur!
Nevertheless there are good reasons to suppose that ammonites were not like squids or cuttlefish in shells. First of their sheer abundance.

Scenes like this are not at all unusual in the fossil record. Indeed if you find ammonites at all, more likely than not, the rock will be stuffed with them. What kind of upper level macropredator is this abundant, or species-rich for that matter?

Ammonites, ammonites, everywhere!

But we don't have to hand wave about the likely ecological role for ammonites. At least for some species we now know that they were indeed micropredators feeding on tiny crustaceans that were likely part of the zooplankton. This is based on synchrotron scanning work that revealed small-scale anatomy of the buccal mass of some very well-preserved ammonites. Published back in 2011 by Kruta et al., these authors suggest that at least aptychophoran ammonites (that is ammonites that had a specialised jaw apparatus called an aptychus) were the major suspension feeders in the Mesozoic oceans. I just go one step further and suggest that it was the swarms of countless millions of ammonites that dominated the suspension feeding niche and prevented the rise of any suspension feeding marine sauropsid. Go molluscs!

In effect the role of a single baleen whale was handled by swarms of ammonites.


Collin, R. and Janis, C.M. 1997. Phylogenetic constraints on feeding adaptations: Why there were no suspension- feeding marine reptiles? E. Nichols and J. Calloway eds. Ancient Marine Reptiles. Society of Vertebrate Paleontology symposium on Mesozoic marine reptiles. Academic Press.

Kruta, I., Landman, N., Rouget, I., Cecca, F., Tafforeau, P. 2011. The role of ammonites in the Mesozoic marine food web revealed by jaw preservation. Science 331: 70-72.


  1. Nice post. While I agree ammonites (and rudistids) were certainly filtering the water I don't necessarily agree that they were excluding tetrapods from the job. Look at the Antarctic marine food web- everything from squid, seals, seabirds and whales is feasting on krill- and there is plenty more krill to go around for humans if we wanted to eat em. Instead I believe there simply was not a concentrated enough food base to support any kind of radiation of endothermic suspension feeders comparable to baleen whales in the Mesozoic. There were large vertebrate filter feeders in the Mesozoic, the fish family Pachycormidae. But these were most likely ectotherms as are the major filter feeders of tropical waters today such as whale sharks and manta rays. Baleen whales today travel to the tropics to give birth- but return to temperate/polar waters to feed for the most part.

    Duane Nash
    antediluvian salad

  2. Of course I am working from the angle that mosasaurs, icthyosaurs, and plesiosaurs were endothermic- which some studies suggest. Still leaves the possibility for massive turtle suspension feeders... now that would be wild!!

  3. If I recall right, there was some study published a couple of years ago in either Nature or Science looking at a well-preserved radial apparatus of Baculites that also suggested filter-feeding habits for this species.

  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

  5. Attractive, post. I just stumbled upon your weblog and wanted to say that I have liked browsing your blog posts. After all, I will surely subscribe to your feed, and I hope you will write again soon! バウンディング